Archive for the ‘brain’ Category

The Corporate Culture Cure

Tuesday, April 5th, 2011

When you hear the word “culture,” you, like most people, probably picture some other land with strange customs you don’t quite comprehend. Culture is odd or other to us, which is why we often fail to see what makes up our own. We’re too close, and our customs are too ubiquitous to think to apply the word to ourselves. We take our rituals and traditions for granted as just a standard way of existing without judgment.

The problem with this is that it presents a challenge for sparking cultural change. At once, cultural change is one of mankind’s greatest adaptation tricks – allowing us to cope and adjust without the need to wait on physical mutation to help us get along in the rapidly changing world – and one of the most confounding things for us to really understand.

Culture, according to a recent essay in The Edge, is an iterative process that involves four pillars:

  • foundational ideas,
  • institutions,
  • everyday practices and artifacts,
  • and selves.

In order to affect cultural change, you need to affect change in all four areas.

When we talk about corporate culture, as we like to do at MindWorks, these things are no less true. And it’s important to be able take off the blinders and study your corporate culture so that you can understand how it works and what you need to change. In light of the assertions in a recent article in the Harvard Business Review, We All Work for Enron Now, it seems that the blindness to your corporate culture could ultimately be your company’s demise. While the article asserts that it pertains to our global economy, the crux breaks down to “lethal” corporate cultures being largely at fault and offers hope by pointing to companies that are making substantive changes. Organizations like The Institute for Sustainability with its Green Plus Certification, and B Labs with its B Corp designation can be a big help in providing structure for building a culture that focuses on the triple bottom line:  people, planet and performance.

By recognizing the ways your ideas, institution, actions, and people comprise your organization and shape its culture, you can begin to make those changes to formulate a stronger company better suited for growth and sustainability. By extension, understanding and embracing culture change puts you in a position to continue to adapt to change, which is coming whether you’re ready for it or not. What are you doing to change your corporate culture for the better?

Do You Know Too Much?

Wednesday, March 23rd, 2011

At MindWorks, we love talking about how the mind works, but it’s also equally important to understand what prevents it from working effectively. That’s why we love the recent article in Newsweek about research done by Angelika Dimoka at the Center for Neural Decision-Making at Temple University. Dimoka and her team looked at the impact of the so-called “information overload” to determine if it’s real and, if so, what its impact could be.  The research has some things to teach us about how we live in the Information Age and what we could be doing better.

Information Overload is Real

First, it seems that information overload is real. The impact of more and more information being thrown at us is that we’re less able to make effective decisions about what’s important, or even make effective decisions, period. The activity in our brains actually moves from one region – the one good at making decisions – to another that raises our anxiety and frustration and urges us to make a decision, any decision, while discounting the important criteria that go into good decision-making. Think of it as filling your office with little paper notes until you can no longer get in the door to do your work.

The Biggest Casualty is Creativity

If all you do is work requiring no creativity or creative problem-solving… wait, scratch that. Of course you have work (at your job, home, or elsewhere) that requires creative thinking. But information overload impacts creative decisions most.  Dimoka’s research shows that, to get to creative answers, we need to slow down and let our brains do what they do without trying to force-feed them more information. In other words, we need to stop drinking from the fire hose.

The problem is that our brains appear to be wired to notice change in such a fundamental way that newness trumps value of information. If a new email comes to your inbox, your mind sees that as more important than the email you just read, ignoring the relative value of the information itself.

So, how do you counter this impact and make great creative decisions?  The answer may be as simple as this:  stop thinking. If you consciously stop working the information over in your head, you let your unconscious mind – which seemingly is better at creative matters – process the problem and come up with the answer.

It may seem counterintuitive to turn off our electronics and stop the flow of information to improve our understanding of the information we’ve consumed through those media, but that’s precisely what research is showing. Though we love our shiny gadgets, just about the best thing we can do to get the most value from them is to turn them off. For a little while, anyway.

Liar, Liar, Brain Cells on Fire

Thursday, July 15th, 2010

From fictional TV pitchman Joe Isuzu to White House gate crashers Tareq and Michaele Salahi, compulsive liars fascinate us. Sure, everyone throws out the occasional fib, but uncontrollable whopper-tellers up the ante from the garden-variety, “No, Officer, I didn’t realize I was speeding.”

You might think that the problem with the honesty-challenged is an inability to separate fact from fiction – and in at least one way, you may be right. Researchers Yaling Yang and Adrian Raine studied the brains of 49 liars and non-liars, and found that the brains of those who persistently stretched the truth formed more connections in a crucial area of their brain than truth-tellers. On average, the liars had 22 to 26 percent more of the connective tissue in the prefrontal cortex that carries electrical signals between neuron groups.

Yang hypothesizes that the increased number of links correlates to an enhanced ability to “jump from one idea to another,” and tie those ideas together in ways that non-liars can’t. While the findings are far from definitive, they open the door for further study, including research on the habitual honesty of autistic individuals.

Well, gotta run. Need to stop off and see my BFF, Madonna, before my lunch date with the Obamas.

And no, those pants don’t make you look fat at all.

Are You Left-Brained or Right-Brained?

Wednesday, June 23rd, 2010

I recently downloaded an interesting mobile application for the iPhone entitled “Are You Left-Brained or Right-Brained?” This application was created by Movisol, a Spanish company that is well known in the entertainment-based mobile application world. The description for the application stated that “based on some simple questions, you will find out your hemisphere dominance and learn how to enhance the way you think.”

I decided to be a guinea pig of sorts and took the quiz to see what the application could determine from my answers. The final results? I took the test twice and received two different classifications. The first test determined that I have a “Golden Brain” (wow, how special am I?). This occurs when you have strong qualities from both hemispheres and neither one is dominant. The second time I took the test, I was judged as being Right Hemisphere Dominant. The words associated with this hemisphere are “holistic,” “random,” “concrete,” “intuitive,” “non verbal” and “fantasy oriented.”

I like this application because it is simple and can improve your awareness of how you process information (did I also mention it is free!). Having a better understanding of how you learn and process information can have a positive impact on your achievement in school or the workplace. Check out the application and let us know your results.

OK, who put Einstein’s brain in the mayonnaise jar?

Tuesday, June 15th, 2010

Thomas Harvey, the man who performed the autopsy on Einstein’s body, did something quite bold. He removed Einstein’s brain and never replaced it. Debate has lingered about the legality of such a move (some say he was given permission by Einstein’s family), but he justified his actions by saying that he felt “a sense of duty to science.”

What did Harvey do with the brain? He put it in a jar with formaldehyde and randomly sent bits to neuroscientists for study (these bits were sometimes mailed in a mayonnaise jar). While Harvey himself was never able to turn Einstein’s brain into solid science, others used the slices for research. Ultimately, these studies led to the discovery of “the other brain” and the role of glia – the glue of the nervous system. If Thomas Harvey and his unique Robin Hood persona interest you, please check out “Driving Mr. Albert: A Trip Across America with Einstein’s Brain” by Michael Paterniti.

For more information, check out the article on npr.com

Your Brain On Computers

Monday, June 7th, 2010

Technology and the rapid speed of information transfer is causing individuals to think and behave differently. This seems to be a pretty obvious statement, but a lot of people may not realize both the positive and negative impacts this cultural shift has created. For example, social networking and e-mail are helping to bring the world together, but it can also negatively impact how we interact with people in face-to-face situations. In the article linked below, Mrs. Campbell believes her husband is missing out on life due to his technology addiction. She says, “It seems like he can no longer be fully in the moment. I would love for him to totally unplug, to be totally engaged.” Why is Mr. Campbell so enthralled with his gadgets and willing to let his life pass him by? Simple – it is widely believed that the constant juggling of incoming information (e-mail, texts, social networking) stimulates the brain to produce dopamine, which is often associated with addiction. In other words, Mr. Campbell has a relationship with technology that is chemically similar to addiction. Most people would agree that this is not healthy and is obviously putting a strain on his personal relationships. Are we all slowly turning into technology obsessed zombies? Are we engaging in similar activities and only realizing it now? I think it’s time for some self evaluation.

Read more on nytimes.com

Prodigious Savant Part II

Thursday, June 3rd, 2010

Recently, we shared the story of Derek Paravicini, an incredibly talented musician who was born with both autism and blindness. Now comes the equally amazing story of Daniel Tammet, a savant who suffers from Asperger Syndrome. Daniel’s incredible ability to memorize numbers (he once recited 22,000+ digits of Pi in the correct order from memory) and learn languages (he learned Icelandic in one week) is a result of synaesthesia. Synaesthesia is a neurologically-based condition that allows Daniel to see numbers as colors and three dimensional shapes, which help him recall and memorize information.

Watch this short clip from 20/20 to learn more about his incredible and fascinating story.

Creatives = Crazy!

Tuesday, June 1st, 2010

Did you ever work with a crazy creative person who didn’t make any sense in the structured business world? Did you find them brilliant, but hard to harness? Don’t worry, you aren’t the only one. As this article tells us, the neural pathways that exist in creative people are also found in individuals with schizophrenia. My favorite quote from the article is: “Creativity is uncomfortable. It is their dissatisfaction with the present that drives them on to make changes.” Maybe all of us should try being a little crazy this week.

Read more from the BBC

Mom Still Knows Best

Wednesday, May 19th, 2010

How can a mother know something is wrong with her child without concrete evidence? “A Mother’s Intuition” is not a new idea or saying, but it is gaining momentum as a study topic for psychiatrists. Of significant interest is that mothers simply seem to know when something is wrong without any proof to back up their assumptions. Even more amazing is that most of the time, they are right.

Read more from The Burlington Free Press

The House Robber

Tuesday, May 18th, 2010

I don’t want to stir up scary thoughts, but I thought this look into the mind of a house robber was fascinating. Rudolph Zinn, a professor at the University of South Africa’s College of Law, interviewed convicted house robbers to gain insight on why they steal, and how they gather “intel.” All of this material was collected for a study which was later turned into his new book “Home Invasion.” One of the most interesting tidbits: Robbers like to strike when the victims are home. Sorry for the shivers.

Read more on Daily Dispatch Online